Received 27.08.2024, Revised 09.11.2024, Accepted 03.12.2024
Hygienic properties for children’s clothing are a significant factor in quality and safety and require careful study and control. However, the technical regulation of safety and hygiene standards for children’s clothing remains a significant challenge in the global market. The mechanism for ensuring the safety of children’s clothing requires new solutions from governments. Key aspects of protecting children’s health in clothing manufacturing include controlling the quality of raw materials, monitoring production processes, and regulating the use of chemical bleaches and dyes. The aim of this work was to examine the hygienic properties of infant clothing entering the Ukrainian market. The assessment of hygienic authorities was carried out using standard methods, including atomic absorption and chromatographic methods. Odorimetric studies revealed that the sample of the “Sova Kids” body suit does not meet the regulatory standards for odour intensity. The results of the study on hygienic properties showed that all samples meet the established requirements, but the “Sova Kids” body suit exhibited the best hygroscopicity. Chemical analysis for heavy metals revealed that in Sample No. 2, the “SMIL” body suit, the copper content exceeds both international and Ukrainian standards by 0.6 μg/kg. A very high concentration of dichlorodiphenyl trichloromethylmethane (DDT) was found in all three samples of infant clothing. These values are 12 to 17 times higher than the established Ukrainian and international standards (permissible limit: up to 0.5 μg/kg). Meanwhile, Sample No. 3 does not include any labeling data or manufacturer information. The results of this study hold practical significance for retail chains selling infant clothing and can be utilised by wholesale and retail entrepreneurs, as well as clothing manufacturers. They also serve as a basis for regulatory authorities, especially certification bodies, to implement stricter measures”
environmental safety; heavy metals; pesticides; assessment of substance content; hygroscopicity
[1] Afanasyeva, V., & Karpenko, Z. (2020). Safety of modern textile materials for children’s clothing. In International science and practice conference “Development of food production, restaurant and hotel industries and trade: Problems, prospects, efficiency” (pp. 247-248). Kharkiv: BTU.
[2] Burks, F., Che, J., & Cao, W. (2021). Sustainable material selection for children’s wear. Journal of Textile Science & Fashion Technology – JTSFT, 9(2), 1-7. doi: 10.33552/JTSFT.2021.09.000708.
[3] Chen, H., Chai, M., Cheng, J., Wang, Y., & Tang, Zh. (2022). Occurrence and health implications of heavy metals in preschool children’s clothing manufactured in four Asian regions. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 245, article number 114121. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114121.
[4] Dewangan, P., & Kumar, R. (2023). Essentiality of kids wear safety regulation. UGC Care Group I Journal, 84(11), 38-47.
[5] Domanova, O.V. (2018). Analysis of marks of knitted caps from Ukrainian manufactures. Modern Engineering and Innovative Technologies, 05-02, 120-124. doi: 10.30890/2567-5273.2018-05-02-039.
[6] DSTU 4057-2001. (2001). Textile materials. Method for identification of fibres. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=90419.
[7] DSTU 22001:2008. (2008). Reagents and highly pure substances. Method of atomic absorption spectrometry for determination of chemical element impurities. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=50947.
[8] DSTU 31407:2014. (2014). Knitted linen garments for infants and nursery-aged children. General technical conditions. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=96689.
[9] DSTU 31410:2014. (2014). Knitted outerwear for men and boys. General technical conditions (GOST 31410-2009, IDT). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=109812.
[10] DSTU 3816:2009 (ISO 811). (2009). Reagents and highly pure substances. Method of atomic absorption spectrometry for determination of chemical element impurities. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=50818.
[11] Gomes, C., Pires, I., Monteiro, L., Lima, T.M., & Gaspar, D.D. (2024). Empowering eco-friendly choices: An environmental impact assessment decision support system for textiles and clothing. Applied Sciences, 14(2), article number 659. doi: 10.3390/app14020659.
[12] Halavska, L.Ye., & Gnatiuk, O.V. (2019). Development of an assortment of knitted products for preschool children using linen eco-raw materials. Bulletin of the Khmelnytskyi National University. Technical Sciences, 1(269), 63-69. doi: 10.31891/2307-5732-2019-269-1-63-69.
[13] Herrero, M., Rovira, J., González, N., Marquès, M., Barbosa, F., Sierra, J., Nadal, M., & Souza, M. (2023). Clothing as a potential exposure source of trace elements during early life. Environmental Research, 15, article number 116479. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116479.
[14] Mikhaylov, S., & Mikhaylov, V. (2010). Safety assessment of synthetic detergents for children clothes. Commodities and Markets, 10(2), 180-186.
[15] Nyamukamba, P., Bantom, C., Mququ, Z., Ngcobo, T., & Isaacs, S. (2020). Determination of the levels of heavy metals and formaldehyde in baby clothes in South Africa: A case study of stores in the greater Cape Town region. Journal of Spectroscopy, 2020, article number 5084062. doi: 10.1155/2020/5084062.
[16] Oeko-Tex Standard 100: The original safety standard. (1992). Retrieved from https://www.oeko-tex.com/en/our-standards/oeko-tex-standard-100.
[17] Rahman, M., Uddin, M., & Biswas, J. (2019). Salt free dyeing of cotton fabric with reactive dyes by using cationic fixing agent. In International conference on sustainable technology for Industry 4.0 (STI 2019) (pp. 24-25). Dhaka, Bangladesh.
[18] Rovira, J., & Domingo, J.L. (2019). Human health risks due to exposure to inorganic and organic chemicals from textiles. Environmental Research, 168, 62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.09.027.
[19] Sanjeevana, D., & Thenmozhi, R. (2022). Study on product safety of children’s apparel. In S.S. Muthu (Ed.), Sustainable approaches in textiles and fashion. Manufacturing processes and chemicals. Singapore: Springer.
[20] Santiago, D., Cabral, I., & Cunha, J. (2024). Children’s functional clothing: Design challenges and opportunities. Applied Sciences, 14(11), article number 4472. doi: 10.3390/app14114472.
[21] Sorumlu, Y., Dirgar, E., Giyimi, C., & Güvenlik, S.V. (2022). Evaluation of baby and child clothes in terms of health and safety. Turkish Journal of Fashion Design and Management, 2(1), 1-10.
[22] State sanitary standards and regulations. (2012). Materials and products are textile, leather and fur. Basic hygiene requirements. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=51225.
[23] Sun, S., Zainudin, N., & Jiao, Y. (2023). Green design of multifunctional children’s clothing: A conceptual framework. Online Journal of Art and Design, 11(5), 107-118.
[24] Turdiyev, M., & Yuldasheva, D. (2021). Hygienic effect of the drapery of children’s clothes. The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research, 30, 48-52. doi: 10.37547/tajiir/Volume03Issue11-09.
[25] Wright, R.H. (1966). Primary odors and insect attraction. The Canadian Entomologist, 98(10), 1083-1093. doi: 10.4039/Ent981083-10.
[26] Zavorotna, O., & Halavska, L. (2022). Study of consumer characteristics of knitted materials for manufacturing children’s clothing. In 3th аll- Ukrainian conference of proceeders of higher education and young scientists. Innovation in education, science and business: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 145-152). Kharkiv: KhNUDT.
[27] Zhaldak, M., Mokrousova, O., & Mykhailova, Н. (2023). Commodity assessment of clothing for newborns. Commodities and Markets, 48(4), 56-68. doi: 10.31617/2.2023(48)05.