ISSN 2310-5283 e-ISSN 3041-1432 UDC 67; 68; 33
en

https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2310-5283-2023-17-4

Vol. 16, No. 1, 2023

47-62

  • Read article

    • Swot-analysis of restaurant establishments infrastructure using university canteen as an example

    Іgor Dudarev Volodymyr Say

    Received 05.02.2023, Revised 07.03.2023, Accepted 09.06.2023

    Abstract

    The aim of the article is to develop the improvement (modernization) strategies of the university canteen infrastructure using the SWOT-analysis method. Methodology. The study was carried out using the SWOT-analysis method, the expert method and statistical methods of generalized experimental data, as well as the brainstorming method. Results. In order to ensure the safety work of canteen employees and the safety stay of clients in canteen, as well as to produce safety products, the university canteen infrastructure must meet the norms and requirements of current regulatory documents. As a result of the study of university canteen infrastructure, advantages and disadvantages of infrastructure were determined, as well as potential external opportunities for infrastructure modernization and threats to infrastructure. The components of the university canteen infrastructure were analyzed such as: the canteen location, canteen volume-planning solution, water supply, sewage, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, power supply, technological equipment and furniture, as well as communication, alarm, garbage disposal, and fire safety systems and ensuring proper sanitary and hygienic condition of the canteen. Using the expert method, the weighting coefficients of the canteen infrastructure components were determined. The importance of advantages and disadvantages for the canteen infrastructure components, as well as potential external opportunities and threats to its functioning, were assessed. Weighted assessments of the advantages and disadvantages of the canteen infrastructure, as well as opportunities and threats for its functioning, were calculated. Practical significance. Strategies for improving (modernizing) the university canteen infrastructure were proposed, according to which the following is appropriate: to allocate a commercial space with a separate entrance from the street and install outdoor advertising; to install modern water and wastewater treatment systems, as well as modernize sewerage; to implement energy-saving technologies; to purchase an autonomous power source; to implement modern payment devices and interactive technologies (electronic menu, online ordering for delivery, etc.), as well as automated business management systems; to implement waste sorting; to install a modern fire safety system; to implement the HACCP system. Keywords: canteen infrastructure, infrastructure modernization strategies, canteen infrastructure components, university canteen, SWOT-analysis, restaurant business establishment.

    Keywords:

    soft juice drink; fruit juice; oat milk; soft drink density; dry substance content in the drink

    Suggested citation
    Dudarev, І., & Say, V. (2023). Swot-analysis of restaurant establishments infrastructure using university canteen as an example. Commodity Bulletin, 16(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2310-5283-2023-17-4
    795 Views

    References

    [1] DBN V.2.2-25:2009. (2010). Buildings and structures. Catering enterprises (restaurants). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=25951

    [2] DSTU 4281:2004. Restaurant establishments. Classification. Retrieved from https://dnaop.com/html/34057/doc-%D0%94%D0%A1%D0%A2%D0%A3_4281_2004.

    [3] Haponenko, H., Yevtushenko, O., Shamara, I., & Kholodok, V. (2021). Main trends of development of the restaurant industry of ukraine in modern conditions. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: International Relations. Economics. Country Studies. Tourism, 14, 132-141. doi: 10.26565/2310-9513-2021-14-13.

    [4] Seliutin, V., Yatsun, L., & Olshanskiy, O. (2020). SWOT-F-analysis of restaurant business in Kharkiv. Economic Analysis, 30(1), 192-200.

    [5] Mykhailova, N.V. (2008). Criteria and indicators for assessing the competitiveness of restaurant enterprises at the level of operational management. Collection of scientific papers "Ekonomichna stratehiia i perspektyvy rozvytku sfery torhivli ta posluh", 2(8), 310-317.

    [6] Naherniuk, D.V. (2016). The main factors forming the competitiveness of enterprises of catering business. Efektyvna Ekonomika, 9.

    [7] Androsova, T.V., Vlasova, N.O., Mykhailova, N.V., & Kruhlova, O.A. (2010). Evaluation of the competitiveness of restaurant enterprises. Kharkiv: KhDUKhT.

    [8] Mannapova, N.R. (2021). Organization and basic requirements for restaurant design interior. International Journal of Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology, 7(5), 5-12.

    [9] Al-Khatib, I.A., & AI-Mitwalli, S.M. (2007). Restaurant environment and its possible effects on food safety: Case study of restaurants in Palestinian Ramallah-Bireh Distric. Jourdan Medical Journal, 41(3), 145-151.

    [10] Smagulov, M.K. (2020). The importance of search and recommended technologies for restaurant business. In Proceedings of the international online-conference "Modern trends of hotel and restaurant business developmen" (pp. 100-101). Nur-Sultan: L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University.

    [11] Christ-Brendemühl, S. (2022). Bridging the gap: An interview study on frontline employee responses to restaurant technology. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, article number 103183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103183.

    [12] Seyitoğlu, F., Ivanov, S., Atsız, O., & Çifçi, I. (2021). Robots as restaurant employees – A doublebarrelled detective story. Technology in Society, 67, article number 101779. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101779.

    [13] Seyitoğlu, F., & Ivanov, S. (2022). Understanding the robotic restaurant experience: A multiple case study. Journal of Tourism Futures, 8(1), 55-72. doi: 10.1108/JTF-04-2020-0070.

    [14] Pudovkin, O.P. (2021). Application of qualimetric methods for assessing quality of complex products. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1728, article number 012018. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1728/1/012018.

    [15] DBN V.2.2-3:2018. (2018). Buildings and structures. Educational institutions. Kyiv: Ministerstvo rehionalnoho rozvytku, budivnytstva ta zhytlovokomunalnoho hospodarstva Ukrainy.